"Josh is in a really good position, so he will be available for selection next week," Cummins said. "I think he's had two spells out there today and feeling great, so he's got quite a bit of work behind him and his body is feeling good."

Heading into the final day against India, Boland, the pick of Australia's pace attack throughout the Test, did not really need to do any more to advance his claims to be a first-choice place in the attack, but he added to his already substantial body of outstanding work anyway.

"I feel like we're starting to become too used to Scotty Boland just doing that," Cummins said. "He just keeps finding another level doesn't he? He's unbelievable. He is just our best bowler all game. Held it together [and] didn't go for many runs. Always looked threatening. To get two wickets in a row was just reward for how well he bowled throughout the whole game."

While Australia have spoken regularly of likely needing to rotate their quicks throughout the Ashes - and therefore the concept of just one 'first choice' attack is probably outdated - it would seem extraordinary if Boland doesn't line up at Edgbaston barring any injury concerns. So the question becomes fitting him in.

The feeling before the final was that if Hazlewood had been fit, or if this had been a one-off game for Australia with no Ashes to follow, he would have played. With 222 wickets at 25.83 and 36 in England at 23.58 it's hard to say that would have been the wrong call. Earlier this year, when he returned from injury against South Africa in Sydney, he played ahead of Boland and took five wickets in the match.

Interestingly, he was demoted from the new ball in the second innings: on only 12 previous occasions in 148 Test innings had he not shared the opening duties. However, Cummins played down any significance over the move.

"I don't think I'd look too much into that," he said. "We did that last Ashes series as well. We chop and change the opening bowlers depending on gut feel. The ball moves a little bit differently to a Kookaburra. It might swing a bit more after a few overs rather than the first couple.

"I thought Starcy bowled well, particularly today. He did a role for us that we know Starcy can do after 80 Test matches. Again, his runs, we were talking about Mitchell Starc the bowler, but he always contributes with the bat as well. He has got a huge tour ahead of him. The English side sets up slightly different as well, there are a few more left handers. Really happy with where Starcy is."

So, either someone who averages under 15 in Test cricket, someone with more than 300 wickets or someone with more than 200 wickets will not be in the XI on Friday. As captains, coaches and selectors like to say, it's a good problem to have. But it still makes for one of most fascinating decisions Australia have faced in recent times.